Skip to Content
Advertisement
Health

Does Nurture Trump Nature in Disease Risk Prediction?

Social determinants of health can match or exceed genetic risk of common diseases

With all of the focus on genetics and disease, it’s easy to forget that humans are more than just the sum of our genes. A new study published in The American Journal of Human Genetics suggests social and environmental factors could play an equal or greater role than genetics in predicting the risk of common diseases. 

Featured Video

To investigate the multifactorial causes of disease, researchers from the Mount Sinai School of Medicine relied on data from the All of Us biobank, which collects information and biological samples from more than 400,000 individuals. They also analyzed survey responses measuring more than 100 social and environmental conditions, which included many risk factors that aren’t usually examined. 

“Some risk factors, such as smoking, have been studied extensively for decades,” study co-author Abhijith Biji said in a statement. “What is especially intriguing is that we also observed associations involving factors like loneliness.”

Read more: “For Every Patient Their Own Drug

Advertisement

By comparing the data to the incidence of six common ailments (asthma, chronic kidney disease, coronary heart disease, high cholesterol, breast cancer, and prostate cancer), they found that incorporating social measures of health boosted their ability to predict disease risk above genetics alone. Additionally, the social, behavioral, and environmental factors seemed to contribute as much or more to the risk of four of the six illnesses studied (asthma, chronic kidney disease, high cholesterol, and coronary heart disease).

“Genes are an important part of the equation, but they do not determine destiny,” study co-author Samira Asgari explained. “We found that the circumstances of people’s lives—their environments, behaviors, and social experiences—can contribute as much as genetics to predicting disease risk.” 

Still, the researchers stress that these findings aren’t about determining the single cause of any of these conditions. Instead, they highlight the need for more comprehensive models of disease risk, that take into account the context in which genes and other factors interact. 

Or as Asgari put it, “To truly understand health, we have to look at the whole person, not just their DNA.”

Advertisement

Enjoying Nautilus? Subscribe to our free newsletter.

Lead image: lembergvector / Adobe Stock

Advertisement

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

Related Stories

What’s Causing The Rise in Rural Mortality?

The problem isn’t entirely health-related

July 15, 2026

Confessions of a Reluctant Protein-Maxxer

America is in the midst of a protein craze

Why Do Men Develop Parkinson’s Disease More Often Than Women?

Differing gene expression patterns could be to blame

Memory Loss May Not Be the Earliest Sign of Alzheimer’s

Your cognitive flexibility may go first

July 3, 2026

When It Comes to Back Pain, Maybe You Should be Your Own Doctor

Empowering patients to retake control of their back pain produced surprising results

Ovaries Might Take on an Immune Function After Menopause

The reproductive organs might have hidden role

July 1, 2026