Skip to Content
Advertisement
Health

How the Gila Monster Gave the World Ozempic

The creature’s toxic venom revolutionized diabetes treatment

4:00 PM CST on February 9, 2026

Close-up of a Gila monster perched on a rock. Credit: Lauren Suryanata / Shuttestock.

Throughout his career in the 1970s and ’80s, Democratic Senator William Proxmire, a deficit hawk from Wisconsin, issued his annual “Golden Fleece Awards,” calling out public expenditures he felt were particularly wasteful. The vast catalog of obscure studies funded by the federal government provided him with a particularly rich well of colorful budget lines to ridicule, like $103,000 for studying the relative aggressiveness of sunfish drinking gin versus tequila. 

Featured Video

While Proxmire is no longer with us, his tradition of singling out scientific studies as the tip of an iceberg of government waste lives on, most notably in the cuts made by the Trump Administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (aka DOGE). But are we really better off pocketing the paltry savings of studies that sound silly to taxpayers? 

Consider the gila monster. These rough-skinned lizards native to the American Southwest only feed a couple times a year and produce a powerful venom to subdue their prey. This venom, a National Institutes of Health researcher found, caused inflammation in the pancreases of test animals. Endocrinologist John Eng of the Veterans Affairs Administration, searching for ways to control diabetes, took note of this fact, and started researching gila monster venom in the early 1990s.

Read more: “Why Scientists Need to Get High

Advertisement

Eng managed to isolate the molecule responsible, a protein called exendin-4 bearing a remarkable resemblance to human glucagon-like-protein-1 (GLP-1), which stimulates insulin production. When administered to diabetic laboratory mice, he discovered it kept their blood glucose down for hours at a time. 

It was an incredible finding. 

The researchers who first identified GLP-1 had tried and failed to turn it into an effective diabetes treatment. Secreted shortly after meals, the hormone disappears in mere minutes, and the high doses required to keep GLP-1 levels up also caused a raft of adverse side effects. Exendin-4, on the other hand, was able to linger for hours and keep blood glucose levels in check. 

The researchers then turned to Eng’s work—and the gila monster—to create a treatment with more staying power. Partnering with Novo Nordisk, the team used exendin-4 as a model to build the first synthetic semaglutides capable of keeping blood sugar low for long periods of time. Today we know them by their brand names: Ozempic, Wegovy, and a host of others.

Advertisement

While the Veteran’s Affairs Administration declined to file a patent for Eng’s work, he did manage to bring his own diabetes drug to the market and notch another victory as well. In 2013, Congressman Jim Cooper created the “Golden Goose Awards” to highlight seemingly frivolous scientific research of immense public benefit. Eng was among the first recipients.

Enjoying  Nautilus? Subscribe to our free newsletter.

Lead image: Lauren Suryanata / Shutterstock

Advertisement

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

Related Stories

Your Dementia Risk Is Higher If Your Spouse Has It—But It’s More Than Shared Lifestyle

A new study looked at almost one million married couples and found dementia clustered among couples. Shared lifestyle doesn’t explain everything.

July 22, 2026

Why the Cyclospora Outbreak Is Hard to Pin Down: An Intimate Encounter

The parasite has a long incubation period, which means affected people might not experience explosive diarrhea up to two weeks after exposure

July 21, 2026

Drinking Water With Meals May Make You Eat More, Not Less

This common dieting tip might be a myth

July 17, 2026

What’s Causing The Rise in Rural Mortality?

The problem isn’t entirely health-related

Confessions of a Reluctant Protein-Maxxer

America is in the midst of a protein craze

Why Do Men Develop Parkinson’s Disease More Often Than Women?

Differing gene expression patterns could be to blame