Skip to Content
Advertisement
Geoscience

How to Predict an Earthquake

In the trenches with a paleoseismologist

Featured Video

We know from dense worldwide seismometer networks that the plate tectonic engine, the primary driver of earthquakes, has not meaningfully changed over our lifetime. But for geologic processes, which operate on the scale of thousands or millions of years, that’s no time at all. To understand the deeper past, geologists must dig into a deeper and often murkier archive.

Katherine Scharer, a USGS geologist, has spent her entire career in the trenches, literally. She and colleagues, other paleoseismologists, contract earthmovers to dig reinforced ditches across California’s most dangerous “headliner faults.” I know this because she was my undergraduate advisor, and in 2006, I spent a summer working in one of those trenches along the San Andreas fault in the dusty foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains.

Read more: “The Ancient Architecture that Defies Earthquakes

That summer, we labored under the hot Southern California sun, navigating aluminum hydraulic shoring meant to keep the trench from collapsing as we stood inside the earth with a quiet sense of mortality, directly atop a live plate boundary. We worked on the property of a retired man who enjoyed our company and showed vague interest in our goals. If memory serves, he even invited us inside, reminding us that “it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.” We probably discussed the scientific holy grail driving the work: establishing how often earthquakes strike, and getting a rough sense of when the next might come.

Along smoothed dirt walls, geologists scan for offset—layers that suddenly jump in a stair-step up or down, evidence that a fault moved during an earthquake. To establish when that happened, they often rely on radiocarbon dating, using bits of wood or plant material plucked from the walls. By dating the offset layers and undisturbed layers above, geologists can bracket the age of past ruptures.

IN THE TRENCHES: USGS geologist Katherine Scharer works to reveal rock and soil layers offset by ancient earthquakes. Credit: Devin McPhillips / USGS.

A single trench may reveal numerous earthquakes, some of which are known from historical records and many that predate written records. From these clues geologists estimate the timing, magnitude, and location of past earthquakes along active faults. This process is repeated in trenches across California, mapping ancient ruptures that scored the earth for miles.

While not entirely diagnostic, paleoseismologists like Scharer have demonstrated that California’s transform fault network, driven by the Pacific tectonic plate as it grinds relentlessly northward against the North American plate, exhibits a certain earthquake cadence. Geologists now know that this fault network, which includes the San Andreas, is practically guaranteed to host a large future earthquake. But scientists like Scharer know the risks vary substantially depending on where one works, resides, or travels across California’s fractured and faulted landscape.

Geologists have established a refined story for the last 1,000 years, but the historical record is even clearer. Between 1800 and 1906, California experienced eight significant, ground-rupturing earthquakes on the San Andreas, San Jacinto, and Hayward faults. Yet over the last 120 years, “there’s zero,” she says. “We went from having basically one every 10 to 20 years to zero over the last 120 years.” A hiatus of this length isn’t unheard of in the geologic record, but it’s stretching the upper limit.

That’s why the USGS says “the likelihood for a magnitude 6.7 or larger earthquake somewhere in the entire region remains near certainty” over the next 30 years. In their “readiness” model, the southern San Andreas, with its visible scar slicing roughly 40 miles from downtown Los Angeles and directly through glitzy Palm Springs, is widely considered prone to rupture. As such, Los Angeles faces a 60 percent chance of a 6.7-magnitude or larger earthquake in the next 30 years.

Paleoseismology, therefore, isn’t just an attempt at cataloging. It’s a science that helps us understand the stark tension between two vastly different timescales, human and geologic, that from time to time unpredictably converge.

Want to learn more? Read “The Earthquake Illusion” 

Enjoying Nautilus? Subscribe to our free newsletter.

Lead image: ONYXprj / Adobe Stock

Advertisement

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Geoscience

Explore Geoscience

The Earthquake Illusion

Why we think quakes are becoming more frequent

May 19, 2026

“Iceland Is Going to Erupt Again Very Soon”

Deep beneath the volcanic island, scientists are trying to predict the next big one

May 11, 2026

Why Volcanoes Sometimes Shoot Out Lightning

Tiny grains produce big charges

April 24, 2026

When “Extinct” Volcanoes Reawaken

They’re filled with a lot more fury than their millennia-long slumber would suggest

April 24, 2026

The Mystery of the Giant Blobs at the Center of the Earth

Are they remnants of primordial Earth or extraterrestrial in origin?

April 21, 2026

Was the Grand Canyon Born from an Ancient Lake Spillover?

It’s a surprisingly controversial question

April 16, 2026