Skip to Content
Advertisement
Paleontology

Ingenious: Ian Tattersall

The meaning of home in human evolution.

Ingenious_HERO

Ingenious_HERO

In his essay, “In Search of the First Human Home,” in this issue of Nautilus, Ian Tattersall calls humans’ modern notion of home “revolutionary.” In our video interview (above), the paleontologist and former chairman of the department of anthropology at the American Museum of Natural History explains why. Our idea of home is characteristic of symbolic thinking, he maintains, a revolution in human development that separates us from all other animals; what’s more, “it’s something that is completely accidental.”

Featured Video

The millions of people who have passed through the august doors of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City have experienced Tattersall’s work. For the past four decades, Tattersall, now a curator emeritus at the museum, has shaped its magnificent exhibitions on human evolution, the primary subject of his many books, the most recent of which is Masters of the Planet: The Search for Our Human Origins.

Tattersall was raised in the “wide open spaces” of Uganda, where his father was a university administrator. He was educated at Cambridge, where he first became enchanted with paleontology, and continued his education at Yale. Looking back, he says, he became a paleontologist in the same way he sees human evolution, “by accident.” During his interview with Nautilus, Tattersall was opinionated and engaging. Our conversation ventured beyond home into the future of human evolution—as Tattersall sees it, we’re pretty much at the end of the line—and the self-correcting process of science itself.

What would 3-million-year-old Lucy’s home have looked like?

How wide was Lucy’s range?

What was Homo sapiens’ first home?

You call the modern notion of home “revolutionary.” Why?

How is it that we understand each other?

Why is our capacity for “symbolic reasoning” significant?

Are we better off for having a sense of home?

What’s the biggest misnomer about human origins?

Aren’t we stuck to this idea of fine-tuning?

Are humans still evolving?

Have you ever been wrong?

Was it difficult to change your opinion?

You’ve been all over the world. Where do you feel most at home?

Advertisement

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

Related Stories

Inside the Brain of a 319-Million-Year-Old Fossil Fish

It paves the way for understanding how ray-finned fishes came to dominate Earth’s oceans

June 29, 2026

What Do You Do When You Lose Gigantic Megalodon Shark Vertebrae?

Megalodons were the apex predators of the Miocene seas

June 28, 2026

Some Neanderthals Were Genetically Healthy Right Up Until the End

Not all populations of the ancient human species were struggling prior to their mysterious demise

June 25, 2026

Archaic Hominin Species Buried Only Their Women

Ancient proteins recovered from the teeth of Homo naledi fossils tell the tale

June 25, 2026

Everyone’s Been Drawing Pterosaur Wings Wrong

Theoretical reconstructions hint at versatile approaches to prehistoric flight

June 24, 2026

These Ancient Millipedes Paved the Way for Terrestrial Life

They preceded vertebrates on land by about 80 million years

June 15, 2026